In re Payne

738 N.E.2d 379, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1466, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2838
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 22, 2000
Docket00-1860
StatusPublished

This text of 738 N.E.2d 379 (In re Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Payne, 738 N.E.2d 379, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1466, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2838 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus by Lowell N. Payne, Jr. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
738 N.E.2d 379, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1466, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-payne-ohio-2000.