In Re Payne & Keller Company, by and Through Its Duly-Appointed Receiver, Peter D. Protopapas v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Payne & Keller Company, by and Through Its Duly-Appointed Receiver, Peter D. Protopapas v. the State of Texas (In Re Payne & Keller Company, by and Through Its Duly-Appointed Receiver, Peter D. Protopapas v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to Dismiss Granted; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed; and Memorandum Opinion filed February 6, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-23-00917-CV
IN RE PAYNE & KELLER COMPANY, BY AND THROUGH ITS DULY- APPOINTED RECEIVER, PETER D. PROTOPAPAS, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 127th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2023-70875
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 5, 2023, relator Payne & Keller Company, by and through its duly-appointed Receiver, Peter D. Protopapas, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Ravi K. Sandill, presiding judge of the 127th District Court of Harris County, to vacate an order signed December 1, 2023 setting motions for a hearing on the merits.
On January 26, 2024, relator filed a motion to dismiss the petition. We grant the motion and dismiss relator’s petition.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Hassan, Poissant, and Wilson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Payne & Keller Company, by and Through Its Duly-Appointed Receiver, Peter D. Protopapas v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-payne-keller-company-by-and-through-its-duly-appointed-receiver-texapp-2024.