In re Paul

190 A.3d 1035, 460 Md. 491
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedAugust 9, 2018
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 9, Sept. Term, 2018
StatusPublished

This text of 190 A.3d 1035 (In re Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Paul, 190 A.3d 1035, 460 Md. 491 (Md. 2018).

Opinion

Upon consideration of the Petition for Reinstatement of Dana Paul and the responses filed thereto, in the above captioned case, it is this 9th day of August, 2018,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and the petitioner, Dana Paul, be, and is hereby, reinstated to the practice of law in this State; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name of Dana Paul upon the register of attorneys entitled to practice law in this State and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this state.

Judge Greene did not participate in the consideration of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 A.3d 1035, 460 Md. 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-paul-md-2018.