In re Paul Herman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Paul Herman

160 A.3d 1173, 2017 D.C. App. LEXIS 140

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 15, 2017

Docket17-BG-492

StatusPublished

This text of 160 A.3d 1173 (In re Paul Herman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Paul Herman, 160 A.3d 1173, 2017 D.C. App. LEXIS 140 (D.C. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of Disciplinary Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s petition for reinstatement wherein Disciplinary Counsel informs the court that Mr. Herman has demonstrated that he is fit to resume the practice of law, and it appearing that petitioner is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, see In re Herman, 138 A.3d 1195 (D.C. 2016), it is

ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Paul Aaron Herman is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI