In re Paul Herman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Paul Herman

160 A.3d 1173, 2017 D.C. App. LEXIS 140

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided June 15, 2017·No. 17-BG-492·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of Disciplinary Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s petition for reinstatement wherein Disciplinary Counsel informs the court that Mr. Herman has demonstrated that he is fit to resume the practice of law, and it appearing that petitioner is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, see In re Herman, 138 A.3d 1195 (D.C. 2016), it is

ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Paul Aaron Herman is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of Disciplinary Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s petition for reinstatement wherein Disciplinary Counsel informs the court that Mr. Herman has demonstrated that he is fit to resume the practice of law, and it appearing that petitioner is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, see In re Herman, 138 A.3d 1195 (D.C. 2016), it is

ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Paul Aaron Herman is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia.

In re Paul Herman, 160 A.3d 1173, 2017 D.C. App. LEXIS 140 (D.C. 2017).

Pincite

160 A.3d 1173 (In re Paul Herman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related