in Re: Paul Dewayne Wilkins v. State
This text of in Re: Paul Dewayne Wilkins v. State (in Re: Paul Dewayne Wilkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed August 24, 2016.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00980-CV
IN RE PAUL DEWAYNE WILKINS, Relator
Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F-01-072813-I
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang, and Justice Brown Opinion by Justice Brown Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in which relator asks this
Court to direct the trial court to rule on his nunc pro tunc motion. The trial court denied relator’s
motion for judgment nunc pro tunc while this original proceeding was pending. We DENY the
petition for writ of mandamus as moot because the trial court has already taken the action relator
asked this Court to order the trial court to take.
/s/ Ada E. Brown ADA E. BROWN JUSTICE
160980F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Paul Dewayne Wilkins v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-paul-dewayne-wilkins-v-state-texapp-2016.