in Re Paul D. Andrews, Keith M. Gould, the Gould Law Firm, and Andrews & Gould

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00784-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE PAUL D. ANDREWS, KEITH M. GOULD, THE GOULD LAW FIRM AND ANDREWS & GOULD

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1

Relators, Paul D. Andrews, Keith M. Gould, The Gould Law Firm, and Andrews &

Gould, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for stay in the

above cause on December 28, 2012. The Court, having examined and fully considered

the petition for writ of mandamus and the emergency motion for stay, is of the opinion

that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions). petition for writ of mandamus and the emergency motion for stay are DENIED. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 28th day of December, 2012.