In re Paul B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Paul B.

266 A.D.2d 835, 698 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11698

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 835 (In re Paul B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Paul B., 266 A.D.2d 835, 698 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11698 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[836]*836—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Erie County Family Court (Rosa, J.). We add only that the court’s finding that respondent “failed to meet the educational needs of the child” was not based on the failure to supply education in accordance with Education Law article 65 (see, Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [A]). Rather, the court’s finding was based on the failure of respondent to meet the three-year-old child’s special emotional needs by refusing to cooperate in a treatment program established to address the child’s developmental delays and behavioral problems (see, Matter of Sayeh R., 91 NY2d 306, 314-315; Matter of Ray, 95 Misc 2d 1026). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Rosa, J. — Neglect.) Present — Denman, P. J., . Hayes, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[836]*836—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Erie County Family Court (Rosa, J.). We add only that the court’s finding that respondent “failed to meet the educational needs of the child” was not based on the failure to supply education in accordance with Education Law article 65 (see, Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [A]). Rather, the court’s finding was based on the failure of respondent to meet the three-year-old child’s special emotional needs by refusing to cooperate in a treatment program established to address the child’s developmental delays and behavioral problems (see, Matter of Sayeh R., 91 NY2d 306, 314-315; Matter of Ray, 95 Misc 2d 1026). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Rosa, J. — Neglect.) Present — Denman, P. J., . Hayes, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 835, 698 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-paul-b-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack