in Re Paul Archie
Opinion
Opinion issued February 4, 2021
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
county court in the court of appeals district; (2) a judge of a district court who is
acting as a magistrate at a court of inquiry under Chapter 52 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure in the court of appeals district; or (3) an associate judge of a
district or county court appointed by a judge under Chapter 201 of the Family
Code in the court of appeals district for the judge who appointed the associate
judge. Id. § 22.221(b). The courts of appeals also may issue all writs necessary to
enforce the court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Id. § 22.221(a).
We have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk
unless necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181,
182 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, orig. proceeding). Because relator’s
petition does not raise any threat to our jurisdiction, we dismiss the petition for
want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Rivas-Molloy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Paul Archie (in Re Paul Archie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.