in Re Paul Archie

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 4, 2021
Docket01-21-00011-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Paul Archie (in Re Paul Archie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Paul Archie, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Opinion issued February 4, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00011-CV ——————————— IN RE PAUL E. ARCHIE, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Paul E. Archie, has filed a “Motion For Leave to File a Writ of

Mandamus,” seeking a writ of mandamus to compel Harris County District Clerk

Marilyn Burgess to issue citation against underlying defendants.

This Court’s mandamus jurisdiction is governed by the Government Code.

See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221. A court of appeals may issue writs of mandamus

against (1) a judge of a district, statutory county, statutory probate county, or county court in the court of appeals district; (2) a judge of a district court who is

acting as a magistrate at a court of inquiry under Chapter 52 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure in the court of appeals district; or (3) an associate judge of a

district or county court appointed by a judge under Chapter 201 of the Family

Code in the court of appeals district for the judge who appointed the associate

judge. Id. § 22.221(b). The courts of appeals also may issue all writs necessary to

enforce the court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Id. § 22.221(a).

We have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk

unless necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181,

182 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, orig. proceeding). Because relator’s

petition does not raise any threat to our jurisdiction, we dismiss the petition for

want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Rivas-Molloy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Washington
7 S.W.3d 181 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Paul Archie, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-paul-archie-texapp-2021.