in Re Paul Archie

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 4, 2021·No. 01-21-00011-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued February 4, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

county court in the court of appeals district; (2) a judge of a district court who is

acting as a magistrate at a court of inquiry under Chapter 52 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure in the court of appeals district; or (3) an associate judge of a

district or county court appointed by a judge under Chapter 201 of the Family

Code in the court of appeals district for the judge who appointed the associate

judge. Id. § 22.221(b). The courts of appeals also may issue all writs necessary to

enforce the court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Id. § 22.221(a).

We have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk

unless necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181,

182 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, orig. proceeding). Because relator’s

petition does not raise any threat to our jurisdiction, we dismiss the petition for

want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Rivas-Molloy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Paul Archie, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

in Re Paul Archie (in Re Paul Archie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Washington
7 S.W.3d 181 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)