in Re: Paul Anthony Couzan
This text of in Re: Paul Anthony Couzan (in Re: Paul Anthony Couzan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed May 22, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-00580-CV
IN RE PAUL ANTHONY COUZAN, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On May 19, 2003, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In his petition, relator requests that we direct the judge of the 177th District Court of Harris County to dismiss his appointed counsel and appoint new counsel. Relator cites no authority showing that mandamus relief is available for this purpose.
We deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 22, 2003.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Fowler and Edelman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Paul Anthony Couzan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-paul-anthony-couzan-texapp-2003.