In re Patterson

Supreme Court

In re Patterson

353 U.S. 952

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 13, 1957

DocketNo. 622

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 353 U.S. 952 (In re Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Patterson, 353 U.S. 952 (1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Oregon is vacated and the case is remanded for reconsideration in light of Konigsberg v. State Bar of California, 353 U. S. 252, and [953]*953Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of New Mexico, 353 U. S. 232. See also Brinkerhoff-Faris Co. v. Hill, 281 U. S. 673.

Charles Allan Hart, Jr. and R. W. Nahstoll for petitioner. Hugh L. Biggs and Cleveland C. Cory for the Oregon State Bar and Public, respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Oregon is vacated and the case is remanded for reconsideration in light of Konigsberg v. State Bar of California, 353 U. S. 252, and [953]*953Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of New Mexico, 353 U. S. 232. See also Brinkerhoff-Faris Co. v. Hill, 281 U. S. 673.

Charles Allan Hart, Jr. and R. W. Nahstoll for petitioner. Hugh L. Biggs and Cleveland C. Cory for the Oregon State Bar and Public, respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

353 U.S. 952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-patterson-scotus-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack