In re Patterson

Supreme Court

In re Patterson

353 U.S. 952

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 13, 1957·No. No. 622·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Oregon is vacated and the case is remanded for reconsideration in light of Konigsberg v. State Bar of California, 353 U. S. 252, and [953] Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of New Mexico, 353 U. S. 232. See also Brinkerhoff-Faris Co. v. Hill, 281 U. S. 673.

Charles Allan Hart, Jr. and R. W. Nahstoll for petitioner. Hugh L. Biggs and Cleveland C. Cory for the Oregon State Bar and Public, respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Oregon is vacated and the case is remanded for reconsideration in light of Konigsberg v. State Bar of California, 353 U. S. 252, and [953] Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of New Mexico, 353 U. S. 232. See also Brinkerhoff-Faris Co. v. Hill, 281 U. S. 673.

Charles Allan Hart, Jr. and R. W. Nahstoll for petitioner. Hugh L. Biggs and Cleveland C. Cory for the Oregon State Bar and Public, respondent.

In re Patterson, 353 U.S. 952 (1957).

Pincite

353 U.S. 952 (In re Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related