In re Patterson

18 F. Cas. 1319, 1 Ben. 544, 6 Int. Rev. Rec. 166, 1 Nat. Bank. Reg. 152, 1867 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Patterson. Read the opinion of the Court — 18 F. Cas. 1320
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 2, 1867·Published

Opinion

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The question, so far as it called on the bankrupt to answer as to whether he had, since the commencement of the proceedings in bankruptcy, lost in gaming any portion of his estate, was objectionable, as calling on him for an answer which might subject him to punishment for a criminal offence, under section 44 of the bankruptcy act. The question was

broad enough to cover the time subsequent to the commencement of the proceedings in bankruptcy, and was, therefore, improper.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Patterson, 18 F. Cas. 1319, 1 Ben. 544, 6 Int. Rev. Rec. 166, 1 Nat. Bank. Reg. 152, 1867 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174 (S.D.N.Y. 1867).

18 F. Cas. 1319 (In re Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.