In re Patterson

254 A.D. 148, 4 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6363

This text of 254 A.D. 148 (In re Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Patterson, 254 A.D. 148, 4 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6363 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Dowling, J.

On April 14, 1937, the petitioner moved at Special Term for an order of peremptory mandamus, directed to the Common Council of the city of Buffalo, compelling it to grant relief to veterans of the Spanish War upon requests of the Joint Buffalo City Board United Spanish War Veterans, or upon the requests of the Committee upon Relief.”

From the petition we learn that in 1903 the Buffalo posts of the Grand Army of the Republic had an executive and memorial committee whose duty it was to administer relief to indigent soldiers of the Civil war, their widows and dependents residing in Buffalo. That in 1903 there were five camps of veterans of the Spanish American war in Buffalo, each of which had a commander, a quartermaster and a full quota of camp officers. Unlike the Grand Army of the Republic, the camps had no central organization through which to function as a unit. In 1903 the camps, in keeping with the rules and regulations of the national body, organized a committee modelled on that of the Grand Army of the Republic and christened it Joint Buffalo City Board United Spanish War Veterans.” This new organization appointed a relief committee and a director of relief. The national body approved of the arrangement, permitted the organization to use the name adopted instead of municipal council ” and recognized it as a camp and as a municipal council possessing the powers and prerogatives exercised by commanders, quartermasters, treasurers and relief committees of regular camps. From 1903 to July, 1936, the relief committee of the central body administered relief to all Spanish war veterans, their widows and dependents residing in Buffalo. The city of Buffalo provided offices for the relief committee in its new municipal building. The committee, in the beginning, had its own staff of employees. Gradually these were replaced by regular city appointees. From 1914 until his death in July, 1936, Albert Hahn, a Spanish war veteran, represented the committee on relief and the board of social welfare of the city of Buffalo in the administration of relief to Spanish war veterans and their dependents. He was on the payroll of the city. Upon his death, William Hildebrand, chairman of the relief committee of the Joint Buffalo [150]*150City Board United Spanish War Veterans, visited the offices of the committee in the municipal building and sought to take possession. The city employees in charge, at the instance of the board of social welfare of Buffalo, refused to deliver possession. The common council of the city of Buffalo likewise refused to recognize the committee on relief or its right to administer relief in Buffalo and it refused to deliver to said committee its books, papers, records and vouchers. Since the death of Hahn, one Joseph Bohn, a regular city employee, has administered relief to Spanish war veterans, their widows and dependents residing in Buffalo, to the exclusion of said committee on relief.

The common council opposed the motion on the following grounds: (1) No camp in Buffalo was qualified to administer relief to Spanish war veterans for the reason no camp had filed the notice and undertaking required by sections 117 and 118 of the Public Welfare Law; (2) that, since the death of Hahn, the committee on relief had presented no demand or request to the common council except that it employ a Spanish war veteran at an annual salary of $2,487.50; (3) the Spanish war veterans in Buffalo are not equipped or organized in accordance with the provisions of the Public Welfare Law to administer relief; (4) the board of social welfare of Buffalo is charged with administering relief in Buffalo, including relief to veterans, their widows and dependents; (5) in 1914 the common council created two bureaus charged with the duty of administering relief to veterans of the Grand Army of the Republic and the Spanish-American war, their widows and dependents; these bureaus have administered such relief since their creation; (6) the common council appropriated and made available for the fiscal year 1936-1937 the sum of $86,000 for veteran relief in Buffalo; (7) veteran relief in Buffalo has always been administered separate and apart from relief accorded to the general poor of the city; (8) the posts and camps in Buffalo have failed to function in respect to the administration of veteran relief.

The learned court rendered a decision holding that petitioner was qualified under the Public Welfare Law to administer relief. On this decision an order was entered, in part, as follows: “ Ordered, that you, the Common Council of the City of Buffalo, forthwith grant relief to Veterans of the Spanish War, and their dependents, only upon requests of the Joint Buffalo City Board, United Spanish War Veterans or of its Relief Committee, and it is further Ordered, that you restore to the possession of said Joint Buffalo City Board United Spanish War Veterans, or to its Relief Committee, all of its books, papers, vouchers and records, had and used by it in connection with the administration of veteran relief.”

[151]*151From this order the common council has appealed to this court. It seeks reversal on three grounds:

1. The common council has no power or jurisdiction over the acts commanded of it by the order of mandamus.

2. Veteran relief in Buffalo has always been administered according to the spirit of the applicable provisions of the Public Welfare Law.

3. The petitioner is not entitled to administer relief under article 14 of the Public Welfare Law.

A brief survey of the history of veterans’ relief in this State will be quite helpful. The Grand Army of the Republic was the pioneer in this activity. The Department of New York Grand Army of the Republic ” was incorporated by chapter 11 of the Laws of 1885 as a body politic and corporate in fact and in name. The object of the corporation (§2, subd. 2) was To assist such former comrades in arms who may need help and protection, and to extend needful aid to the widows and orphans of our deceased comrades.” This was indeed a laudable enterprise. Apparently the demand for assistance was such that the Legislature in 1887 felt obliged to intervene. By chapter 706 of the Laws of 1887 there was passed An act to provide for the relief of indigent soldiers, sailors and marines, and the families of those deceased.” Section 1 of this act permitted towns and cities in this State to provide money For the relief of indigent and suffering soldiers, sailors and marines, who served in the war of the rebellion, and their families, or the families of those deceased, who need assistance.” The money thus appropriated was to be drawn upon by the commander and quartermaster of any post of the Grand Army of the Republic in said city or town, upon the recommendation of the relief committee of said post, in the same manner as is now provided by law for the relief of the poor.”

Section 3 provided that if the commander of any post undertook. the relief of indigent veterans, before his acts should become operative, he must file with the city clerk of a city or the town clerk of a town notice that his post intended to undertake such relief work and a similar notice shall be filed annually thereafter. This act was amended by chapter 261 of the Laws of 1888 and chapter 598 of the Laws of 1896. These amendments are not. important here. By this enactment the State of New York committed itself, and very properly so, to a policy of permitting veterans to administer relief to their comrades and to the widows and dependents of deceased comrades.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D. 148, 4 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-patterson-nyappdiv-1938.