In re Patterson-Auld

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Patterson-Auld

732 A.2d 1199, 557 Pa. 269, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 2033

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 8, 1999

DocketPetition No. 20 DB 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 732 A.2d 1199 (In re Patterson-Auld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Patterson-Auld, 732 A.2d 1199, 557 Pa. 269, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 2033 (Pa. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[270]*270 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 1999, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated June 9, 1999, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that JANE PATTERSON-AULD, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[270]*270 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 1999, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated June 9, 1999, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that JANE PATTERSON-AULD, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

732 A.2d 1199, 557 Pa. 269, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 2033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-patterson-auld-pa-1999.