In re Patten

New Mexico Supreme Court

In re Patten

675 P.2d 417, 100 N.M. 685

CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 30, 1984

DocketDisciplinary Proceeding No. 15249

StatusPublished

This text of 675 P.2d 417 (In re Patten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Patten, 675 P.2d 417, 100 N.M. 685 (N.M. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court after the completion of disciplinary proceedings conducted pursuant to Rule 13(d) of the former Rules Governing Discipline wherein Respondent was found to have violated Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4) and 1-102(A)(6) by virtue of his having been convicted on May 9, 1983, of the felonies of Fraud (over $2,500.00), Forgery and Conspiracy, and the Court having reviewed all transcripts and the recommendations of the Hearing Committee and the Disciplinary Board, and there being no issues unique to this case which need to be addressed by this Court in an opinion;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent be disbarred.

The costs of this action in the amount of $335.24 are hereby assessed against Respondent.

This Order is to be published in the State Bar of New Mexico News and Views and the New Mexico Reports.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court after the completion of disciplinary proceedings conducted pursuant to Rule 13(d) of the former Rules Governing Discipline wherein Respondent was found to have violated Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4) and 1-102(A)(6) by virtue of his having been convicted on May 9, 1983, of the felonies of Fraud (over $2,500.00), Forgery and Conspiracy, and the Court having reviewed all transcripts and the recommendations of the Hearing Committee and the Disciplinary Board, and there being no issues unique to this case which need to be addressed by this Court in an opinion;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent be disbarred.

The costs of this action in the amount of $335.24 are hereby assessed against Respondent.

This Order is to be published in the State Bar of New Mexico News and Views and the New Mexico Reports.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

675 P.2d 417, 100 N.M. 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-patten-nm-1984.