In re Patrick Z.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Patrick Z.

297 A.D.2d 324, 746 N.Y.2d 265, 746 N.Y.S.2d 265, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7919

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 12, 2002·Published

Opinion

Viewing the evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing in the light most favorable to the Presentment Agency (see Matter of Kerlyn T., 252 AD2d 557, 558; cf. People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of unlawful imprisonment in the second degree (see Penal Law § 135.05) and sexual misconduct committed while acting in concert with other persons (see Penal Law § 20.00, 130.20). Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Adams and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Viewing the evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing in the light most favorable to the Presentment Agency (see Matter of Kerlyn T., 252 AD2d 557, 558; cf. People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of unlawful imprisonment in the second degree (see Penal Law § 135.05) and sexual misconduct committed while acting in concert with other persons (see Penal Law § 20.00, 130.20). Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Adams and Rivera, JJ., concur.

In re Patrick Z., 297 A.D.2d 324, 746 N.Y.2d 265, 746 N.Y.S.2d 265, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

297 A.D.2d 324 (In re Patrick Z.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related