Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Patrick Z.

In re Patrick Z.

297 A.D.2d 324, 746 N.Y.2d 265, 746 N.Y.S.2d 265, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7919
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 12, 2002
StatusPublished

This text of 297 A.D.2d 324 (In re Patrick Z.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Patrick Z., 297 A.D.2d 324, 746 N.Y.2d 265, 746 N.Y.S.2d 265, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Viewing the evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing in the light most favorable to the Presentment Agency (see Matter of Kerlyn T., 252 AD2d 557, 558; cf. People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of unlawful imprisonment in the second degree (see Penal Law § 135.05) and sexual misconduct committed while acting in concert with other persons (see Penal Law § 20.00, 130.20). Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Adams and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
In re Kerlyn T.
252 A.D.2d 557 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 324, 746 N.Y.2d 265, 746 N.Y.S.2d 265, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-patrick-z-nyappdiv-2002.