in Re: Patrick Eugene Malley
This text of in Re: Patrick Eugene Malley (in Re: Patrick Eugene Malley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 16, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00458-CV
IN RE PATRICK EUGENE MALLEY, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On May 12, 2005, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator seeks a writ of mandamus against the district clerk of Brazoria County requiring him to send documents to the Court of Criminal Appeals.
We have no authority to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless such is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.CSan Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding). Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 16, 2005.
Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Seymore, and Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Patrick Eugene Malley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-patrick-eugene-malley-texapp-2005.