In Re Patrick Earl Tarkington v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Patrick Earl Tarkington v. the State of Texas (In Re Patrick Earl Tarkington v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-23-00305-CV
In re Patrick Earl Tarkington
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s
failure to set for hearing his plea to the jurisdiction. Having reviewed the petition and the record
provided, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); see also
Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a); In re Smith, No. 03-14-00478-CV, 2014 WL 4079922, at *2
(Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 13, 2014, orig. proceeding) (denying mandamus relief when relator
failed to provide sufficient record from which to evaluate claim for mandamus relief); In re
Halley, No. 03-15-00310-CV, 2015 WL 4448831, at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin July 14, 2015)
(orig. proceeding) (concluding that a six-month delay did not constitute an unreasonable length
of time under “failure to rule” analysis).
__________________________________________ Edward Smith, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Smith
Filed: July 13, 2023
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Patrick Earl Tarkington v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-patrick-earl-tarkington-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.