in Re Patrick Earl Tarkington

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 23, 2021·No. 03-21-00361-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00361-CV

In re Patrick Earl Tarkington

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s

failure to grant his trial attorney’s motion to withdraw. This Court subsequently received a copy

of the trial court's docket sheet, indicating that the motion to withdraw has been granted. See In

re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) (“A case

becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal

proceedings ....”). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.

__________________________________________ Edward Smith, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Smith

Filed: September 23, 2021

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Patrick Earl Tarkington, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

in Re Patrick Earl Tarkington (in Re Patrick Earl Tarkington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.
166 S.W.3d 732 (Texas Supreme Court, 2005)