in Re Patrick Earl Tarkington
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-21-00361-CV
In re Patrick Earl Tarkington
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s
failure to grant his trial attorney’s motion to withdraw. This Court subsequently received a copy
of the trial court's docket sheet, indicating that the motion to withdraw has been granted. See In
re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) (“A case
becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal
proceedings ....”). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.
__________________________________________ Edward Smith, Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Smith
Filed: September 23, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Patrick Earl Tarkington (in Re Patrick Earl Tarkington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.