in Re: Patrick Doak, Jerry Zemanski and Steven Bin
Opinion
Writ of Mandamus is Conditionally Granted; Opinion Filed July 26, 2013.
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-00538-CV
IN RE PATRICK DOAK, JERRY ZEMANSKI AND STEVEN BIN, Relators
On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296-00538-2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Myers Opinion by Justice Lang Relators filed this petition for writ of mandamus claiming the trial court erred in ordering
them to submit to depositions under TEX. R. CIV. P. 202. For the reasons articulated in our
opinion of today’s date in In re Campo, et al., No. 05-13-00477-CV, we conclude the trial court
abused its discretion in ordering the depositions and that relators have no adequate remedy by
appeal. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). We
therefore conditionally grant the writ of mandamus. A writ will issue only in the event the trial
court fails to vacate its April 5, 2013 “Order Granting Davaco, Inc.’s Rule 202 Petition” and to
render an order denying that petition.
/Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 130538F.P05 JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Patrick Doak, Jerry Zemanski and Steven Bin (in Re: Patrick Doak, Jerry Zemanski and Steven Bin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.