in Re Patricia Scozzari and James Cagle

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Patricia Scozzari and James Cagle

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 4, 2016·No. 02-16-00069-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00069-CV

IN RE PATRICIA SCOZZARI AND RELATORS JAMES CAGLE

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

TRIAL COURT NO. 324-528524-13

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and “Motion To Stay” and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied and Relators’ “Motion To Stay” is denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ. DELIVERED: March 4, 2016

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00069-CV

IN RE PATRICIA SCOZZARI AND RELATORS JAMES CAGLE

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

TRIAL COURT NO. 324-528524-13

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and “Motion To Stay” and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied and Relators’ “Motion To Stay” is denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ. DELIVERED: March 4, 2016

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).

in Re Patricia Scozzari and James Cagle, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

in Re Patricia Scozzari and James Cagle (in Re Patricia Scozzari and James Cagle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.