in Re Patricia Scozzari and James Cagle
This text of in Re Patricia Scozzari and James Cagle (in Re Patricia Scozzari and James Cagle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-16-00069-CV
IN RE PATRICIA SCOZZARI AND RELATORS JAMES CAGLE
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING TRIAL COURT NO. 324-528524-13
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
The court has considered Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and
“Motion To Stay” and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly,
Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied and Relators’ “Motion To Stay”
is denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.
DELIVERED: March 4, 2016
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Patricia Scozzari and James Cagle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-patricia-scozzari-and-james-cagle-texapp-2016.