in Re: Patricia Gelsky

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 1, 2014
Docket05-14-00442-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Patricia Gelsky (in Re: Patricia Gelsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Patricia Gelsky, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Deny and Opinion Filed May 1, 2014.

S Court of Appeals In The

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00442-CV

IN RE PATRICIA GELSKY, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-54109-2011

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Evans Opinion by Justice Moseley The Court has before it relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in which relator requests that

the Court compel the trial court to sign an order denying real party in interest relief on his petition to

modify the parent-child relationship and, instead, sign an order dismissing the case. The facts and

issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Relator has not shown she

is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Mandamus is intended to be an

extraordinary remedy, available only in limited circumstances, and not for grievances that may be

addressed by other remedies such as an appeal. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex.

1992) (orig. proceeding); In re Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, 106 S.W.3d 332, 333 (Tex. App.—

Dallas 2003, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus.

140442F.P05 /Jim Moseley/ JIM MOSELEY JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's
106 S.W.3d 332 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Patricia Gelsky, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-patricia-gelsky-texapp-2014.