In Re Pathfinder Services, LLC D/B/A Coastal Terminal Services v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Pathfinder Services, LLC D/B/A Coastal Terminal Services v. the State of Texas (In Re Pathfinder Services, LLC D/B/A Coastal Terminal Services v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued April 27, 2023
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00963-CV ——————————— IN RE PATHFINDER SERVICES, LLC D/B/A COASTAL TERMINAL SERVICES, JACOB ANSLUM, JILL ANSLUM, DUSTIN DITTMAN, SLEGTE HOND, LLC, CHAD VLASAK, AND MONA VLASAK, Relators
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relators, Pathfinder Services, LLC, doing business as Coastal Terminal
Services, Jacob Anslum, Jill Anslum, Dustin Dittman, Slegte Hond, LLC, Chad
Vlasak, and Mona Vlasak, filed a petition for writ of mandamus asserting that the trial court abused its discretion in its “interpretation” and application of the trial
court’s February 18, 2022 temporary injunction order.1
On April 10, 2023, relators filed a “Notice of Withdrawal of Petition for Writ
of Mandamus,” stating that “[b]ased on subsequent orders from the trial court, [the]
bases of their Petition for Writ of Mandamus ha[d] become moot and [relators]
desire[d] to withdraw” their petition. Relators therefore requested that “the [C]ourt
remove [their mandamus petition] from its docket.” We construe relators’ notice of
withdrawal as a motion to voluntarily dismiss their petition for writ of mandamus.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
Relators’ motion does not include a certificate of conference, but more than
ten days have passed since the motion was filed, and no party has opposed the relief
requested in the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2).
Accordingly, we grant relators’ motion and dismiss the petition. We dismiss
any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.
1 The underlying case is Pathfinder Services, LLC v. Jacob Anslum, Jill Anslum, and Dustin Dittman, Cause No. 2021-50845, in the 190th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Beau A. Miller presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Pathfinder Services, LLC D/B/A Coastal Terminal Services v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pathfinder-services-llc-dba-coastal-terminal-services-v-the-state-texapp-2023.