In Re Partridge

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In Re Partridge

682 S.E.2d 489, 384 S.C. 440, 2009 S.C. LEXIS 377

DecidedAugust 21, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 682 S.E.2d 489 (In Re Partridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Partridge, 682 S.E.2d 489, 384 S.C. 440, 2009 S.C. LEXIS 377 (S.C. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On November 3, 2006, the Court placed petitioner on interim suspension and, on July 18, 2007, definitely suspended him from the practice of law for one (1) year. In the Matter of Partridge, 374 S.C. 179, 648 S.E.2d 590 (2007); In the Matter of Partridge, 371 S.C. 20, 637 S.E.2d 309 (2006). The Court denied petitioner’s request to make the interim suspension retroactive to the date of his interim suspension. In the Matter of Partridge, supra.

On March 13, 2008, petitioner filed a Petition for Reinstatement and the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness (CCF). See Rule 33(d), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. The CCF filed a Report and Recommendation recommending the Court deny the Petition for Reinstatement.

Petitioner filed exceptions to the CCF’s Report and Recommendation. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) did not file exceptions to the CCF’s Report and Recommendation.

After consideration of the entire record, the Court grants the Petition for Reinstatement. Petitioner is hereby reinstated to the practice of law.

IT IS SO ORDERED,

s/ John H. Waller, Jr. A.C. J. s/ Costa M. Pleicones J. s/ Donald W. Beatty J. s/ John W. Kittredge J. s/ James E. Moore A.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI