In re Parry

647 N.E.2d 774, 72 Ohio St. 3d 75
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 30, 1995·No. No. 95-354·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record in this case and agree with the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Parry is not approved for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. However, irrespective of filing deadlines, Parry may reapply for admission and to take the July 1995 bar examination, the approval of which applications shall remain subject to a favorable evaluation of Parry’s character and fitness.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Parry, 647 N.E.2d 774, 72 Ohio St. 3d 75 (Ohio 1995).

647 N.E.2d 774 (In re Parry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Manayan
807 N.E.2d 313 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)
In re Hyland
663 A.2d 1309 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1995)
In re Application of Parry
1995 Ohio 139 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)