Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/In re Parles

In re Parles

889 A.2d 1160, 585 Pa. 641, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 3272
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 1, 2005
DocketNo. 1060 DISC. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 889 A.2d 1160 (In re Parles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Parles, 889 A.2d 1160, 585 Pa. 641, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 3272 (Pa. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of December, 2005, Craig E. Paries having been disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated June 21, 2005; the said Craig E. Paries having been directed on September 8, 2005, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed,.it is

ORDERED that Craig E. Paries is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
889 A.2d 1160, 585 Pa. 641, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 3272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-parles-pa-2005.