In re Parker
This text of 580 S.E.2d 144 (In re Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By way of the attached order of the Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee, respondent was publicly censured for misconduct involving an irrevocable family trust agreement he established for a client.1
We find that the misconduct established warrants a public reprimand in this state as well. See Rule 29(d), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for the misconduct set forth in the order of the Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee.
PUBLIC REPRIMAND.
ATTACHMENT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
580 S.E.2d 144, 354 S.C. 209, 2003 S.C. LEXIS 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-parker-sc-2003.