In re Park

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Park

702 A.2d 827, 152 N.J. 27, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 533

DecidedNovember 12, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 702 A.2d 827 (In re Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Park, 702 A.2d 827, 152 N.J. 27, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 533 (N.J. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on September 17, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that MICHAEL L. PARK of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate); RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities); and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MICHAEL PARK is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[28]*28ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on September 17, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that MICHAEL L. PARK of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate); RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities); and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MICHAEL PARK is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[28]*28ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

702 A.2d 827, 152 N.J. 27, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-park-nj-1997.