in Re: Parental Rights as to D.T.

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: June 14, 2013
• Docket: 62126
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

been absent from her life, and the court determined that termination of appellant's parental rights was in the child's best interest. See NRS 128.105(1). Having considered the appellate record, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the district court's order terminating appellant's parental rights. See In re of Parental Rights as to D.R.H., 120 Nev. 422, 428, 92 P.3d 1230, 1234 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'

' J. Hardesty

Parraguirre

J.

cc: Hon. Robert Teuton, District Judge, Family Court Division Philip J.T. Kainen Law Group, PLLC Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg Eighth District Court Clerk

'Appellant has filed a request for the preparation of the transcript. We have determined that the transcript is unnecessary to make a decision in this matter. Appellant has also filed a motion for permission to file briefs. Having concluded that appellant's civil appeal statement is sufficient to address the merits of this appeal, we deny appellant's motion.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A

WEIN DMIIIROME1