In Re: Parental Rights As To A.M.C.
This text of In Re: Parental Rights As To A.M.C. (In Re: Parental Rights As To A.M.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
IN THE MATTER OF THE PARENATL No. 79651 RIGHTS AS TO: A. M. C., A MINOR CHILD.
VALENTIN ANTHONY C., Appellant, FILED VS. OCT 1 8 2019 ELIZABETH C., BROWN . Respondent. CLERK ME COURT 111, BY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a motion for the appointment of counsel. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Dixie Grossman, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an
/9-43vOr appeal from an order denying a motion for the appointment of counsel. This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1
, J• Hardesty
AlAipi..0 , J. Stiglich Silver
cc: Hon. Dixie Grossman, District Judge Valentin Anthony C. Elizabeth C. Washoe District Court Clerk
'Given this dismissal, the court takes no action on the pro se documents filed on October 3 and 8, 2019. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(D) I947A .4054, 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Parental Rights As To A.M.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-parental-rights-as-to-amc-nev-2019.