In re Pardue

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Pardue

185 So. 3d 745, 2016 La. LEXIS 470, 2016 WL 868404

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 4, 2016

DocketNo. 2016-B-0109

StatusPublished

This text of 185 So. 3d 745 (In re Pardue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Pardue, 185 So. 3d 745, 2016 La. LEXIS 470, 2016 WL 868404 (La. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING '

PER CURIAM.

JjThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent was arrested on charges of-operating a vessel while intoxicated, aggravated flight from an officer, resisting an officer, and having no stern lights on the vessel he was operating. Respondent subsequently pleaded no contest to careless operation and flight from an officer. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Ashton DeVan Pardue, Louisiana Bar Roll number 25815, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING '

PER CURIAM.

JjThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent was arrested on charges of-operating a vessel while intoxicated, aggravated flight from an officer, resisting an officer, and having no stern lights on the vessel he was operating. Respondent subsequently pleaded no contest to careless operation and flight from an officer. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Ashton DeVan Pardue, Louisiana Bar Roll number 25815, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 So. 3d 745, 2016 La. LEXIS 470, 2016 WL 868404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pardue-la-2016.