Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Paradowski v. Rowland

In re Paradowski v. Rowland

286 A.D.2d 879, 730 N.Y.S.2d 894, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8949
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 28, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 286 A.D.2d 879 (In re Paradowski v. Rowland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Paradowski v. Rowland, 286 A.D.2d 879, 730 N.Y.S.2d 894, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: The order before us on this appeal recites that it was entered upon the consent of the parties. No appeal lies from the order because respondent is not aggrieved thereby (see, CPLR 5511; Matter of Hartnett v Hartnett, 242 AD2d 535, 535-536). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Rosa, J. — Custody.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Hayes, Burns and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Polyak v. Toyber
2 A.D.3d 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
286 A.D.2d 879, 730 N.Y.S.2d 894, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-paradowski-v-rowland-nyappdiv-2001.