In re Paradowski v. Rowland
286 A.D.2d 879, 730 N.Y.S.2d 894, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8949
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 28, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: The order before us on this appeal recites that it was entered upon the consent of the parties. No appeal lies from the order because respondent is not aggrieved thereby (see, CPLR 5511; Matter of Hartnett v Hartnett, 242 AD2d 535, 535-536). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Rosa, J. — Custody.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Hayes, Burns and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Paradowski v. Rowland, 286 A.D.2d 879, 730 N.Y.S.2d 894, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).
286 A.D.2d 879 (In re Paradowski v. Rowland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Polyak v. Toyber
2 A.D.3d 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)