In re Pappas
This text of 202 A.3d 1272 (In re Pappas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its supplemental decision in DRB 18-317 (formerly DRB 17-282), following a remand pursuant to the Order of the Court filed September 7, 2018, concluding that Hercules Pappas of Haddon field, **122who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1997, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities);
And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that an admonition is the appropriate a quantum of discipline for respondent's unethical conduct;
*1273And good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that Hercules Pappas is hereby admonished; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 A.3d 1272, 237 N.J. 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pappas-nj-2019.