In Re Paper City Mill Supply Co.
This text of 28 F.2d 115 (In Re Paper City Mill Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is conceded that the bankrupt was insolvent, and the evidence makes clear that it was deeply insolvent, at the times when the goods in question were bought. As persons in charge of a business are presumed to he aware of its financial condition, in a general way, at least, and to intend the necessary consequences of their acts, purchases on credit under such conditions are presumptively fraudulent. This inference may be overcome by evidence which shows that the transactions in question were entered into in good faith by the buyers, .with a real, though illusory, expectation of making payment. In re Siegal Co. (D. C.) 223 F. 368; In re Gurvitz (D. C.) 276 F. 931; In re Morrill-Mascot Co. (D. C.) 286 F. 449.
In the present case the learned referee was satisfied by the evidence that Goldberg and Belsky, who were in charge of the bankrupt’s affairs, acted in good faith. Upon such a question the conclusion of the judge, who sees the witnesses and is in the atmosphere of the case; carries great weight. I am not convinced that his decision was clearly wrong, and his orders must be affirmed. I should have reached the same result, perhaps with rather less hesitation, if he had decided the other way.
Orders affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 F.2d 115, 1928 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-paper-city-mill-supply-co-mad-1928.