In re Paone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Paone

896 A.2d 1163, 586 Pa. 658, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 728

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 23, 2006

DocketNo. 172 Disciplinary Docket No. 7

StatusPublished

This text of 896 A.2d 1163 (In re Paone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Paone, 896 A.2d 1163, 586 Pa. 658, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 728 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2006, the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated January 30, [659]*6592006, are approved and it is ORDERED that Nicholas L. Paone, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2006, the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated January 30, [659]*6592006, are approved and it is ORDERED that Nicholas L. Paone, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

896 A.2d 1163, 586 Pa. 658, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-paone-pa-2006.