In re Paolo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Paolo

125 A.D.2d 1, 512 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 40588

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 125 A.D.2d 1 (In re Paolo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Paolo, 125 A.D.2d 1, 512 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 40588 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on March 15,1978, under the name Kathleen Marcel Paolo.

On August 28, 1986, the respondent was convicted after a jury trial in the Supreme Court, New York County, of grand larceny in the second degree (Penal Law former § 155.35, a class D felony), and conspiracy in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 105.05, a class A misdemeanor).

Pursuant to Judiciary Law. § 90 (4), upon her conviction of a felony, the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State.

Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred and it is directed that the respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law forthwith.

Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Bracken, Niehoff and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI