In re Pantoja

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Pantoja

788 A.2d 282, 170 N.J. 319, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 29

DecidedJanuary 24, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 788 A.2d 282 (In re Pantoja) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Pantoja, 788 A.2d 282, 170 N.J. 319, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 29 (N.J. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court in DRB 96-343, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline, RAFAEL M. PANTOJA, JR., of NEW YORK, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, and who [320]*320was temporarily suspended from the practice of law by Order of the Court filed on September 28, 1994, and who remains suspended at this time, be disbarred based on his disbarment by the Supreme Court of New York on June 16, 1994, for conduct constituting violations of RPC 8.4(b)(criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness) and RPC 8.4(c)(conduct' involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and RAFAEL M. PANTOJA, JR., having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause in this matter, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RAFAEL M. PANTOJA, JR., be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that RAFAEL M. PANTOJA, JR., be and hereby is permanently restrained and énjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court in DRB 96-343, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline, RAFAEL M. PANTOJA, JR., of NEW YORK, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, and who [320]*320was temporarily suspended from the practice of law by Order of the Court filed on September 28, 1994, and who remains suspended at this time, be disbarred based on his disbarment by the Supreme Court of New York on June 16, 1994, for conduct constituting violations of RPC 8.4(b)(criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness) and RPC 8.4(c)(conduct' involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and RAFAEL M. PANTOJA, JR., having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause in this matter, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RAFAEL M. PANTOJA, JR., be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that RAFAEL M. PANTOJA, JR., be and hereby is permanently restrained and énjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

788 A.2d 282, 170 N.J. 319, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pantoja-nj-2002.