In Re Panmore
125 A. 926, 96 N.J. Eq. 397, 11 Stock. 397, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 436
Opinion
The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baches.
For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenohard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays—15.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Panmore, 125 A. 926, 96 N.J. Eq. 397, 11 Stock. 397, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 436 (N.J. 1924).
125 A. 926 (In Re Panmore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.