In re Pancratz

Illinois Supreme Court

In re Pancratz

211 Ill. 2d 653

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 2004

DocketMR 19582

StatusPublished

This text of 211 Ill. 2d 653 (In re Pancratz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Pancratz, 211 Ill. 2d 653 (Ill. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Court:

The motion by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to approve and confirm the report and recommendation of the Hearing Board is allowed, and respondent James E. Pancratz is suspended from the practice of law for three months. Suspension effective October 18, 2004.

Respondent James E. Pancratz shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Fitzgerald, J., took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Court:

The motion by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to approve and confirm the report and recommendation of the Hearing Board is allowed, and respondent James E. Pancratz is suspended from the practice of law for three months. Suspension effective October 18, 2004.

Respondent James E. Pancratz shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.

Fitzgerald, J., took no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 Ill. 2d 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pancratz-ill-2004.