In re Pamm

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Pamm

573 A.2d 144, 118 N.J. 556, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 169

DecidedApril 19, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 573 A.2d 144 (In re Pamm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Pamm, 573 A.2d 144, 118 N.J. 556, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 169 (N.J. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with this Court recommending that GLORIA L. PAMM of HOLMDEL, who was admitted to the Bar of this State in 1973, be publicly reprimanded (1) for the improper preparation of a client’s certification, in violation of DR 7-106(C)(7) and DR 102(A)(6), (2) for gross negligence, improper withdrawal from employment, and improper practice of law in another jurisdiction without following required regulations, all in violation of DR 6-101(A)(1), DR 2-110(A)(2), and DR 3-101(B), respectively, and (3) for improperly engaging in ex parte communication with a judge in violation of RPC 3.5(b), and cause appearing;

[557]*557IT IS ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board is adopted and GLORIA L. PAMM is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the Decision and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board, together with this order and the full record of the matter, be added as a permanent part of the file of GLORIA L. PAMM as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Financial Ethics Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

WITNESS, the Honorable Robert N. Wilentz, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 19th day of April 1990.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with this Court recommending that GLORIA L. PAMM of HOLMDEL, who was admitted to the Bar of this State in 1973, be publicly reprimanded (1) for the improper preparation of a client’s certification, in violation of DR 7-106(C)(7) and DR 102(A)(6), (2) for gross negligence, improper withdrawal from employment, and improper practice of law in another jurisdiction without following required regulations, all in violation of DR 6-101(A)(1), DR 2-110(A)(2), and DR 3-101(B), respectively, and (3) for improperly engaging in ex parte communication with a judge in violation of RPC 3.5(b), and cause appearing;

[557]*557IT IS ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board is adopted and GLORIA L. PAMM is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the Decision and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board, together with this order and the full record of the matter, be added as a permanent part of the file of GLORIA L. PAMM as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Financial Ethics Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

WITNESS, the Honorable Robert N. Wilentz, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 19th day of April 1990.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

573 A.2d 144, 118 N.J. 556, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pamm-nj-1990.