In re Pamela A. McLean
This text of In re Pamela A. McLean (In re Pamela A. McLean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
No. 21-BG-269
IN RE PAMELA A. MCLEAN, RESPONDENT.
A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (Bar Registration No. 497891)
On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility Ad Hoc Hearing Committee Approving Petition for Negotiated Discipline (DDN 84-19)
(Decided: September 30, 2021)
Before GLICKMAN and DEAHL, Associate Judges, and NEBEKER, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM: This decision is non-precedential. Please refer to D.C. Bar R.
XI, § 12.1(d) regarding the appropriate citation of this opinion.
In this disciplinary matter, an Ad Hoc Hearing Committee (the Committee)
recommends approval of a petition for negotiated attorney discipline. See D.C. Bar
R. XI, § 12.1(c). Respondent admits to violating D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct
1.6(a)(1) and 1.7(b)(4). The proposed discipline is a sixty-day suspension with thirty
days stayed in favor of one-year of probation with conditions. 2
Having reviewed the Committee’s recommendation in accordance with our
procedures in uncontested disciplinary cases, see D.C. Bar R. XI, § 12.1(d), we agree
this case is appropriate for negotiated discipline and the proposed disposition is not
unduly lenient or inconsistent with dispositions imposed for comparable
professional misconduct. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Respondent Pamela A. McLean is hereby suspended from
the practice of law in the District of Columbia for sixty days with thirty days stayed
in favor of one-year of probation with conditions that require Respondent to not
engage in any misconduct and complete twelve hours of CLE courses pre-approved
by Disciplinary Counsel. In the event Respondent’s probation is revoked, she will
serve the remaining thirty days of her suspension. Additionally, we direct
Respondent’s attention to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), which requires the filing of an
affidavit with this court for purposes of reinstatement in accordance with D.C. Bar
R. XI, § 16 and Board Rule 9.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re Pamela A. McLean, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pamela-a-mclean-dc-2021.