In re Palmer (William M.) On H.C.

California Supreme Court

In re Palmer (William M.) On H.C.

445 P.3d 1004, 250 Cal. Rptr. 3d 495

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 31, 2019

DocketS256149

StatusPublished

This text of 445 P.3d 1004 (In re Palmer (William M.) On H.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Palmer (William M.) On H.C., 445 P.3d 1004, 250 Cal. Rptr. 3d 495 (Cal. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Review is ordered on the court's own motion. The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following: (1) Did this life prisoner's continued confinement become constitutionally disproportionate under article I, section 17 of the California Constitution and/or the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution? (2) If this life prisoner's continued confinement became constitutionally disproportionate, what is the proper remedy? The request for an order directing depublication of the opinion in the above-entitled appeal is denied. For the purposes of briefing and oral argument, the Attorney General is deemed the petitioner in this court. ( Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.520(a)(6).)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Review is ordered on the court's own motion. The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following: (1) Did this life prisoner's continued confinement become constitutionally disproportionate under article I, section 17 of the California Constitution and/or the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution? (2) If this life prisoner's continued confinement became constitutionally disproportionate, what is the proper remedy? The request for an order directing depublication of the opinion in the above-entitled appeal is denied. For the purposes of briefing and oral argument, the Attorney General is deemed the petitioner in this court. ( Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.520(a)(6).)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

445 P.3d 1004, 250 Cal. Rptr. 3d 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-palmer-william-m-on-hc-cal-2019.