In Re Palmer

298 P.2d 179, 298 P. 179, 19 Cal. App. 2d 5, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1285
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 17, 1931
DocketDocket No. 2047.
StatusPublished

This text of 298 P.2d 179 (In Re Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Palmer, 298 P.2d 179, 298 P. 179, 19 Cal. App. 2d 5, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1285 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

HOUSER, J.

The application to this court for a writ of habeas corpus was based upon facts identical with those set forth in the proceeding entitled “In the Matter of the Application of Milton Page” (Crim. No. 2045), in which an opinion and judgment has this day been filed by this court (ante, p. 1 [298 Pac. 178]).

Basing our conclusion herein upon the ruling in said case of Page, it is ordered that the petitioner be discharged from custody.

Conrey, P. J., concurred.

York, J., dissented.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on May 2, 1931, and the following opinion then rendered thereon:

THE COURT.

The petition of the People for rehearing after judgment by this court in this habeas corpus proceeding having been offered for filing on April 27, 1931, the clerk will file the petition as of that date. The justices of this court, however, being of the opinion that the judgment is final and not subject to review, and being further of the opinion that the provisions of section 1506 of the Penal Code have no application to this ease, it is ordered that said petition for rehearing be dismissed. (Ex parte Zany, 164 Cal. 724, 729 [130 Pac. 710].)

A petition to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was granted by the Supreme Court on May 14, 1931; but thereafter, on November 25, 1931, the Supreme Court, holding it had no jurisdiction, dismissed" the proceeding. The opinion of the Supreme Court is reported in 214 Cal. 792 [5 Pac. (2d) 608].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Page
298 P.2d 178 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
Matter of Palmer
5 P.2d 608 (California Supreme Court, 1931)
Matter of Zany
130 P. 710 (California Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
298 P.2d 179, 298 P. 179, 19 Cal. App. 2d 5, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-palmer-calctapp-1931.