In re Palitto

111 A.3d 94, 221 N.J. 256, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 291
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 31, 2015
StatusPublished

This text of 111 A.3d 94 (In re Palitto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Palitto, 111 A.3d 94, 221 N.J. 256, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 291 (N.J. 2015).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-186 and DRB 14U187, concluding that JOHN J. PALITTO, JR., of HADDONFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(a) (commingling trust and personal funds), RPC 1.15(b) (failure to promptly disburse client funds), RPC 1.15(d) (failure to comply with recordkeeping requirements of Rule 1:21-6), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should be required to deposit all unidentified funds remaining in his trust account with the Superior Court Trust Fund within thirty days after the filing date of the Court’s Order;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOHN J. PALITTO, JR., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that within thirty days after the filing date of the Court’s Order, respondent shall deposit all unidentified funds [257]*257remaining in his attorney trust accounts with the Superior Court Trust Fund pursuant to Rule 1:21 — 6(j); and it is further

ORDERED that the requirement in the Order filed June 11, 2013, that respondent practice law under the supervision of a practicing attorney is hereby vacated; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of ihis State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 A.3d 94, 221 N.J. 256, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-palitto-nj-2015.