In re Palese

32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 386, 1977 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 211
CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois
DecidedNovember 14, 1977
DocketNo. 00133
StatusPublished

This text of 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 386 (In re Palese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Palese, 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 386, 1977 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 211 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1977).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This claim, arising out of the death of a policeman allegedly killed in the line of duty, seeks payment of compensation to the decedent’s beneficiaries pursuant to the provisions of the “Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act,” (hereafter, the Act,) Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 48, Sec. 281 et seq., 1975.

The Court has carefully considered the application for benefits submitted on the form prescribed and furnished by the Attorney General’s Office; a written statement of the decedent’s supervising officer; and a report by the Illinois Attorney General’s Office which substantiates matters set forth in the application. Based upon these documents and other evidence submitted, the Court finds that:

1. The claim herein was filed in behalf of Robert Joseph Palese; son of Chicago Police Sergeant Michael R. Palese; Robert Joseph Palese was designated as beneficiary of Sgt. Palese by form dated December 1, 1969.

2. Sgt. Palese, age 45, was a full-time police sergeant, employed by the Chicago Police Department, and engaged in the active performance of his duties, within the meaning of Section 2(e) of the Act, on March 22,1977.

3. On March 22,1977, Sgt. Palese, within regularly assigned duty hours and in uniform, was killed when struck by a railroad train, during a snow storm at 12:45 a.m. while searching the railroad right-of-way for a six-year-old girl who had been reported missing from her home near the search area. Sgt. Palese was killed instantaneously, and the immediate cause of his death was recited as “multiple injuries, extreme.”

4. Sgt. Palese was killed in the line of duty as defined in Section 2(e) of the Act.

5. The proof submitted in support of this claim satisfies all of the requirements of the Act and the claim is therefore compensable thereunder.

It is héreby ordered that the sum of $20,000.00 be awarded to Robert Joseph Palese, the son and designated beneficiary of Chicago Police Sgt. Michael R. Palese.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 386, 1977 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-palese-ilclaimsct-1977.