In re Pagones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Pagones

87 A.D.2d 620, 450 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15928

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A.D.2d 620 (In re Pagones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Pagones, 87 A.D.2d 620, 450 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15928 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

— Motion by petitioner (1) to direct that such action as it deems necessary or proper to determine whether respondent, George L. Pagones, an attorney and counselor at law is incapacitated from practicing law by reason of mental infirmity or illness; and (2) if upon consideration, it is concluded that respondent is incapacitated from practicing law, then, an order be entered suspending him on the grounds of such disability for an indefinite period. Motion granted; this court finds that the respondent presently is incapacitated from practicing law and he is suspended from the practice of law for an indefinite period of time and pending further order of this court, pursuant to the rules of this court (22 [621]*621NYCRR 691.13). Gary L. Casella, Chief Counsel to the Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, 200 Bloomingdale Road, White Plains, New York, is designated as counsel to prosecute the proceeding on behalf of the committee, in place of Donald E. Humphrey, who is relieved of the designation. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Titone, Lazer and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion by petitioner (1) to direct that such action as it deems necessary or proper to determine whether respondent, George L. Pagones, an attorney and counselor at law is incapacitated from practicing law by reason of mental infirmity or illness; and (2) if upon consideration, it is concluded that respondent is incapacitated from practicing law, then, an order be entered suspending him on the grounds of such disability for an indefinite period. Motion granted; this court finds that the respondent presently is incapacitated from practicing law and he is suspended from the practice of law for an indefinite period of time and pending further order of this court, pursuant to the rules of this court (22 [621]*621NYCRR 691.13). Gary L. Casella, Chief Counsel to the Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, 200 Bloomingdale Road, White Plains, New York, is designated as counsel to prosecute the proceeding on behalf of the committee, in place of Donald E. Humphrey, who is relieved of the designation. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Titone, Lazer and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.2d 620, 450 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pagones-nyappdiv-1982.