In Re: Pactiv LLC
This text of In Re: Pactiv LLC (In Re: Pactiv LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE: PACTIV LLC, Appellant ______________________
2015-1457, 2015-1458 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 90/011,596, 90/011,597. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
DANIEL SHULMAN, Reynolds Group Holdings Ltd., Lake Forest, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOHN CHRISTOPHER GATZ, Nixon Peabody LLP, Chicago, IL.
AMY J. NELSON, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, ROBERT J. MCMANUS. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (TARANTO, LINN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 16, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Pactiv LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pactiv-llc-cafc-2016.