In re Pack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Pack

235 A.D.2d 124, 664 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10647

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 235 A.D.2d 124 (In re Pack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Pack, 235 A.D.2d 124, 664 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10647 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Second Department, on December 16, 1966. Respondent formerly served as president and chairman of the board of directors of Jefferson National Bank. On October 23, 1996, respondent was convicted after a jury trial in the Federal [125]*125District Court for the Northern District of New York of conspiracy to commit bank fraud, bank fraud and corrupt acceptance / receipt of commissions for procuring loans, in violation of 18 USC §§ 371,1344 and 215, respectively. On December 30, 1996 (234 AD2d 1014), this Court entered an order suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why a final order of discipline should not be entered pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) and (e). Respondent failed to respond and by letter waived his appearance before the Court. On July 28, 1997, respondent was sentenced in Federal District Court to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 30 months on each count.

We conclude that bank fraud is essentially similar to scheme to defraud in the first degree, a class E felony, in violation of Penal Law § 190.65 (see, Matter of Holm, 201 AD2d 41). Accordingly, respondent is automatically disbarred pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) and (e).

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Callahan and Fallon, JJ., concur.

Final order of disbarment entered pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) and (e).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Second Department, on December 16, 1966. Respondent formerly served as president and chairman of the board of directors of Jefferson National Bank. On October 23, 1996, respondent was convicted after a jury trial in the Federal [125]*125District Court for the Northern District of New York of conspiracy to commit bank fraud, bank fraud and corrupt acceptance / receipt of commissions for procuring loans, in violation of 18 USC §§ 371,1344 and 215, respectively. On December 30, 1996 (234 AD2d 1014), this Court entered an order suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why a final order of discipline should not be entered pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) and (e). Respondent failed to respond and by letter waived his appearance before the Court. On July 28, 1997, respondent was sentenced in Federal District Court to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 30 months on each count.

We conclude that bank fraud is essentially similar to scheme to defraud in the first degree, a class E felony, in violation of Penal Law § 190.65 (see, Matter of Holm, 201 AD2d 41). Accordingly, respondent is automatically disbarred pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) and (e).

Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Callahan and Fallon, JJ., concur.

Final order of disbarment entered pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b) and (e).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D.2d 124, 664 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pack-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack