In Re Pac Craft Corp., Debtor. Pac Craft Corporation v. David Hughes, Trustee

Fifth Circuit

In Re Pac Craft Corp., Debtor. Pac Craft Corporation v. David Hughes, Trustee

424 F.2d 1073

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 22, 1970·No. 28748·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.

The appellant herein urges that the ruling of the District Court below, affirming the Referee in Bankruptcy wherein he authorized the return to Wolf and Balter of certain checks which were deposited by them with the disbursing agent under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act, be reversed.

After reviewing the briefs filed herein, it is the conclusion of this Court that the Referee in Bankruptcy was correct in his order, and the District Judge committed no error in affirming the order of the Referee. Accordingly, the decision of the District Court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.

The appellant herein urges that the ruling of the District Court below, affirming the Referee in Bankruptcy wherein he authorized the return to Wolf and Balter of certain checks which were deposited by them with the disbursing agent under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act, be reversed.

After reviewing the briefs filed herein, it is the conclusion of this Court that the Referee in Bankruptcy was correct in his order, and the District Judge committed no error in affirming the order of the Referee. Accordingly, the decision of the District Court is

Affirmed.

In Re Pac Craft Corp., Debtor. Pac Craft Corporation v. David Hughes, Trustee, 424 F.2d 1073 (5th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

424 F.2d 1073 (In Re Pac Craft Corp., Debtor. Pac Craft Corporation v. David Hughes, Trustee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related