In re Pablo M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Pablo M.

272 A.D.2d 224, 708 N.Y.S.2d 616, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5916

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 224 (In re Pablo M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Pablo M., 272 A.D.2d 224, 708 N.Y.S.2d 616, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about November 9, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of sodomy in the first degree (two counts) and sexual abuse in the first degree (four counts), and placed him on probation for two years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Lerner, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about November 9, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of sodomy in the first degree (two counts) and sexual abuse in the first degree (four counts), and placed him on probation for two years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Lerner, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 224, 708 N.Y.S.2d 616, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pablo-m-nyappdiv-2000.