In re P. Children

172 A.D.2d 839
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 29, 1991
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 172 A.D.2d 839 (In re P. Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re P. Children, 172 A.D.2d 839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from a dispositional order of the Family Court, Kings County (Palmer, J.), dated April 9, 1990, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated February 9, 1990, determining that her three children were abused, after a hearing, placed the children with the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for one year.

[840]*840Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

It is undisputed that the petitioner made out a prima facie case of abuse by establishing that the appellant mother’s two-year-old daughter, Janiqua had contracted gonorrhea. Once a prima facie case was established by the petitioner, the burden of going forward shifted to the parent or person responsible for Janiqua to offer a satisfactory explanation for the occurrence of the injuries (see, Matter of Jesse S., 152 AD2d 581; Matter of Marcus S., 123 AD2d 702; see also, Matter of Jacinta J., 140 AD2d 990). In this case, the mother did not offer a satisfactory explanation to rebut the petitioner’s evidence, which included, inter alia, the injury to Janiqua and the mother’s own positive test results for gonorrhea. Consequently, we find that the Family Court could properly find that the mother’s conduct either caused or contributed to the abuse of Janiqua and endangered the other children (see, Family Ct Act § 1012 [g]; Matter of Jacinta J., supra). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Kunzeman and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Shade B.
99 A.D.3d 1001 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Aliyah G.
95 A.D.3d 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Lauren B.
200 A.D.2d 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
In re Amanda LL.
195 A.D.2d 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Dutchess County Department of Social Services ex rel. Douglas E. v. Douglas E.
191 A.D.2d 694 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re Norland B.
191 A.D.2d 632 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re Heith S.
189 A.D.2d 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Suffolk County Department of Social Services v. James M.
188 A.D.2d 603 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re Philip M.
186 A.D.2d 462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re Alan G.
185 A.D.2d 319 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re Jose Y.
177 A.D.2d 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 A.D.2d 839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-p-children-nyappdiv-1991.